Home › Research › How AI decides who to recommend

SEMPITE Research · AI Visibility Index · August 2026 · Archived

More Than 2 in 5 of Google’s Top-Ranked Local Businesses Are Invisible to ChatGPT

We pulled the top-3 map-pack businesses for 50 category–city markets (5 industries × 10 major U.S. cities), then asked AI engines to recommend providers in each. They named specific businesses every single time, just not always the ones winning on Google. This is our second monthly run, and every category we track lost ground.

Archived and corrected, 17 September 2026

This is the August 2026 edition as originally published. Its figures are wrong. The rule that decided whether an AI answer mentioned a business counted generic words from the Google listing (the city, “real estate”, “plumbing”) as a mention, which overstated visibility. Re-scored with the corrected rule, August’s ChatGPT figure is 96% of Google’s top-3 businesses never named, not 43%. The July comparison figures (32%, 24%, 11%) could not be re-scored and are withdrawn, and the Google AI Mode figures on this page are not comparable.

Please cite the current edition instead, which carries the full correction, the data and the code.

43%of Google’s top-3 businesses were never mentioned by ChatGPT ↑ from 32% in July
42%of #1 map-pack businesses missed ChatGPT’s list entirely ↑ from 24%
15%of Google’s top-3 skipped by Google’s own AI Mode ↑ from 11%
100%of AI answers named specific local businesses unchanged

ChatGPT visibility by category

Share of Google’s top-3 businesses that ChatGPT actually mentions:

Plumbers33% visible ↓14
Dentists47% visible ↓10
Injury lawyers60% visible ↓17
HVAC67% visible ↓10
Real estate77% visible ↓6

The everyday trades still fare worst, two-thirds of top-ranked plumbers never appear in ChatGPT’s recommendations, and every category slipped between July and August.

What this means

AI assistants are already answering “who should I hire?” with confident, specific recommendations, and those recommendations are not simply Google’s rankings restated. Businesses that dominate the map pack are being skipped by the fastest-growing recommendation channel on earth, while competitors with clearer entities, stronger citations, and more AI-legible content take their place.

The Google AI Mode number deserves its own sentence: even Google’s own AI declines to mention 15% of the businesses Google’s own map pack ranks top-3. But the gap between the two engines is the real finding. Google’s AI Mode still names the #1 map-pack business 90% of the time. It is largely Google’s rankings in a conversational voice. ChatGPT names that same business 58% of the time. If you treat “AI search” as one channel, you are averaging two engines that disagree sharply about who deserves the recommendation.

If you’ve invested years in ranking on Google, this is the blind spot worth checking first. The playbook for fixing it is in our AI Search Visibility guide.

July → August change

Same 50 markets, same prompts, same engines, one month apart:

ChatGPT invisibility32% → 43%
#1 skipped by ChatGPT24% → 42%
Google AI Mode invisibility11% → 15%

A caution we’d rather state than bury: this is two data points, not a trend. Language models are non-deterministic, and some of this movement is ordinary run-to-run variance rather than the engines genuinely re-ranking local businesses. What we can say is that the direction was consistent across all five categories and both engines, which variance alone would not usually produce. We’ll know more with a third run in September, and we’ll publish it whichever way it moves.

Methodology

August 2026 full run (data collected 1 August 2026): 50 category–city markets: plumber, dentist, personal injury lawyer, real estate agent, and HVAC contractor across New York, Los Angeles, Chicago, Houston, Phoenix, Philadelphia, San Antonio, San Diego, Dallas, and Miami. Baseline = top-3 Google Maps results per market (via DataForSEO). Engines: ChatGPT (gpt-4o-mini, prompted “I need a [category] in [city]… recommend specific businesses by name”) and Google AI Mode (query “best [category] in [city]”). Mentions matched on distinctive business-name tokens; an engine that returns no answer for a market is excluded from that market’s stats, never counted as a miss. July comparison figures come from the identical run configuration executed in July 2026. Claude is not in this month’s panel. It is paused pending API funding, and we report it as absent rather than as a zero. The index repeats monthly. Data available on request under CC-BY.

Frequently asked questions

What share of top-ranked local businesses does ChatGPT ignore?

43% of Google's top-3 map-pack businesses across 50 markets were never mentioned by ChatGPT in the August 2026 run, up from 32% in July. 42% of the number-one map-pack businesses missed ChatGPT's list entirely.

How was the index built?

The top-3 map-pack businesses were pulled for 50 category-city markets, 5 industries across 10 major US cities, then AI engines were asked to recommend providers in each. Data for the August run was collected on 1 August 2026.

Does Google's own AI agree with Google's rankings?

Mostly. Google AI Mode skipped 15% of Google's top-3 businesses and named the number-one map-pack business 90% of the time, against 58% for ChatGPT. The two engines disagree sharply about who deserves the recommendation.

Which categories fare worst?

Plumbers, with only 33% of top-ranked shops visible in ChatGPT, then dentists at 47%, injury lawyers at 60%, HVAC at 67% and real estate at 77%. Every category slipped between July and August.

Is one month of change a trend?

Not yet. The study states plainly that two data points are not a trend and that language models vary run to run, though the direction was consistent across all five categories and both engines. A third run follows in September.

Is your business in the answers?
Run the free 60-second check: the same engine, pointed at you.

Check My AI Visibility →

Cite as: SEMPITE AI Visibility Index, August 2026 · sempite.com/research/ai-visibility-index/ · Press: hello@sempite.com

Related studies

All studies in this area: How AI decides who to recommend →